According to FINRA, the amendments address current concerns with the expungement process by providing safeguards for ensuring reported information about investment professionals is accurate and complete.
All information related to customer complaints, arbitration, and litigation are maintained in the Central Registration Depository (CRD) and BrokerCheck. The CRD collects registration information including administrative, regulatory, and criminal history, and a myriad of financial information about FINRA “Associated Persons” (Rule 1011(b): those registered under FINRA) such as investment-related information, customer complaints, arbitrations, and civil litigation information. BrokerCheck is a free FINRA online tool used by investors and other members of the public to gain information related to stockbrokers (referred to in the industry as Associated Persons) and broker-dealer firms. The information listed also includes customer complaints, arbitration and civil litigation information.
Expungement requests may be made through the following: (1) a customer arbitration; or (2) a “straight-in-request” arbitration. See Code §§ 12800; 12805; 13805; 13806. A customer arbitration occurs where an investment-related claim is filed by a customer in a FINRA arbitration seeking broad relief that also results in some adverse disclosure on the Associated Person’s (i.e. FINRA registered individual) record. An expungement request may be made during this arbitration claim by the Associated Person. A straight-in request is a similar FINRA arbitration claim but is initiated directly by the Associated Person seeking relief to remove the adverse disclosure on their record.
The only way to remove an adverse disclosure from CRD or BrokerCheck is by a court-ordered expungement or order confirming an arbitration award directing the removal. The amendments to the Codes effects each type of expungement request.
In order to obtain expungement relief, there must be judicial or arbitral findings that: (1) the claim is factually impossible or clearly erroneous; (2) the registered person was not involved in the alleged misconduct; or (3) the claim is false. See Code § 2080. This rule has not been amended and remains the standard going forward. That said, under the Codes prior to the current amendments, FINRA initially contemplated that expungements would be “an extraordinary remedy” recommended only under appropriate circumstances. See FINRA Guidance, Attachment B (Sept. 2017 Update).
However, there was growing concern over the effectiveness of the expungement procedure and whether the outcome of such expungement processes resulted in expungement relief being actually treated as an “extraordinary remedy.” The Public Investors Advocate Bar Association (“PIABA”) issued a study concluding that under the current Codes and procedure, arbitrators granted expungement requests 90% of the time. Further, brokers and broker-firms’ expungement requests went largely unopposed because, according to PIABA, the Codes did not provide investors with an interest in the outcome of the expungement request as a result of customers not being permitted to present evidence or otherwise participate in the hearings. See, PIABA Foundation Expungement Study (May 2021).
Having considered this study, the SEC has now approved various amendments addressing the concerns under the old FINRA Codes. While not exhaustive, the below list provides a look at perhaps some of the most notable amendments to the Codes affecting expungement requests:
See also, FINRA Regulatory Notice 23-12
The Amendments will become effective on October 16, 2023.
All Rights Reserved | Robert D. Mitchell