The Form U5 submitted for our clients indicated that, at the time of their termination, they were under investigation for “violating investment-related statutes, regulations, rules or industry standards of conduct.” The explanation made by the firm on their U5 was “[a]llegations of potential violation of Schwab’s business conduct policy for inaccurate note taking system.”
In its award, the panel found that the claim, allegation or information was factually impossible or clearly erroneous, and was false. The panel recommended that the U5s show the terminations as “voluntary” and that the termination explanation be deleted in its entirety.
We are very proud of this favorable outcome for our clients, whose good reputation in the securities industry was rightfully restored by the arbitration panel.
